X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=drivers%2Fmtd%2Fchips%2Fmap_ram.c;h=283be02dc311af6f7fedf517a074b0c1d884c941;hb=9bf4aaab3e101692164d49b7ca357651eb691cb6;hp=7e17b452e1c23ede060e65e07f4b64b47f1777aa;hpb=db216c3d5e4c040e557a50f8f5d35d5c415e8c1c;p=linux-2.6.git

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/map_ram.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/map_ram.c
index 7e17b452e..283be02dc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/map_ram.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/map_ram.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * Common code to handle map devices which are simple RAM
  * (C) 2000 Red Hat. GPL'd.
- * $Id: map_ram.c,v 1.17 2003/05/28 12:51:49 dwmw2 Exp $
+ * $Id: map_ram.c,v 1.20 2004/08/09 13:19:43 dwmw2 Exp $
  */
 
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -104,13 +104,17 @@ static int mapram_erase (struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
 	/* Yeah, it's inefficient. Who cares? It's faster than a _real_
 	   flash erase. */
 	struct map_info *map = (struct map_info *)mtd->priv;
+	map_word allff;
 	unsigned long i;
 
-	for (i=0; i<instr->len; i++)
-		map_write8(map, 0xFF, instr->addr + i);
+	allff = map_word_ff(map);
 
-	if (instr->callback)
-		instr->callback(instr);
+	for (i=0; i<instr->len; i += map_bankwidth(map))
+		map_write(map, allff, instr->addr + i);
+
+	instr->state = MTD_ERASE_DONE;
+
+	mtd_erase_callback(instr);
 
 	return 0;
 }