X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=CodingStyle;h=2f24ee396f057ded30413ad71e80e46797d10be9;hb=2d344ba5be310b085806b6e6b80833039465722b;hp=2ee189faf0f4bfe4b2734aeebce182392ef41943;hpb=b93e69830a5606712f1ec0132e250839afbd87c4;p=sliver-openvswitch.git diff --git a/CodingStyle b/CodingStyle index 2ee189faf..2f24ee396 100644 --- a/CodingStyle +++ b/CodingStyle @@ -249,6 +249,18 @@ details. (Some compilers also assume that the "if" branch is the more common case, so this can be a real form of optimization as well.) +RETURN VALUES + + For functions that return a success or failure indication, prefer +one of the following return value conventions: + + * An "int" where 0 indicates success and a positive errno value + indicates a reason for failure. + + * A "bool" where true indicates success and false indicates + failure. + + MACROS Don't define an object-like macro if an enum can be used instead. @@ -286,6 +298,21 @@ the name of each enum. For example: }; +THREAD SAFETY ANNOTATIONS + + Use the macros in lib/compiler.h to annotate locking requirements. +For example: + + static struct ovs_mutex mutex = OVS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; + static struct ovs_rwlock rwlock = OVS_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER; + + void function_require_plain_mutex(void) OVS_REQUIRES(mutex); + void function_require_rwlock(void) OVS_REQ_RDLOCK(rwlock); + + Pass lock objects, not their addresses, to the annotation macros. +(Thus we have OVS_REQUIRES(mutex) above, not OVS_REQUIRES(&mutex).) + + SOURCE FILES Each source file should state its license in a comment at the very @@ -432,8 +459,8 @@ precedence makes it necessary, or unless the operands are themselves expressions that use && and ||. Thus: if (!isdigit((unsigned char)s[0]) - || !isdigit((unsigned char)s[1]) - || !isdigit((unsigned char)s[2])) { + || !isdigit((unsigned char)s[1]) + || !isdigit((unsigned char)s[2])) { printf("string %s does not start with 3-digit code\n", s); } @@ -474,9 +501,8 @@ global variables. C DIALECT - Try to avoid using GCC extensions where possible. - - Some C99 extensions are OK: + Some C99 features are OK because they are widely implemented even in +older compilers: * Flexible array members (e.g. struct { int foo[]; }). @@ -491,9 +517,8 @@ C DIALECT only take on the values 0 or 1, because this behavior can't be simulated on C89 compilers. - Don't use other C99 extensions, and especially: - - * Don't use // comments. + Don't use other C99 features that are not widely implemented in +older compilers: * Don't use designated initializers (e.g. don't write "struct foo foo = {.a = 1};" or "int a[] = {[2] = 5};"). @@ -505,3 +530,11 @@ C DIALECT * Don't put a trailing comma in an enum declaration (e.g. don't write "enum { x = 1, };"). + + As a matter of style, avoid // comments. + + Avoid using GCC or Clang extensions unless you also add a fallback +for other compilers. You can, however, use C99 features or GCC +extensions also supported by Clang in code that compiles only on +GNU/Linux (such as lib/netdev-linux.c), because GCC is the system +compiler there.