X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=arch%2Fm68k%2Fhp300%2Fints.c;h=9fe4a96053b3bd503d7841f4ae68680a755c86d7;hb=720b94a4e7548e78be55ab8fd3be4686c57dc808;hp=40a2cdcc5d209354278581f145714c0d2969ceff;hpb=86090fcac5e27b630656fe3d963a6b80e26dac44;p=linux-2.6.git

diff --git a/arch/m68k/hp300/ints.c b/arch/m68k/hp300/ints.c
index 40a2cdcc5..9fe4a9605 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/hp300/ints.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/hp300/ints.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
  * Service routines are added via hp300_request_irq() and removed
  * via hp300_free_irq(). The device driver should set IRQ_FLG_FAST
  * if it needs to be serviced early (eg FIFOless UARTs); this will
- * cause it to be added at the front of the queue rather than 
+ * cause it to be added at the front of the queue rather than
  * the back.
  * Currently IRQ_FLG_SLOW and flags=0 are treated identically; if
  * we needed three levels of priority we could distinguish them
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hp300_int_handler(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *fp)
                 t->handler(irq, t->dev_id, fp);
         /* We could put in some accounting routines, checks for stray interrupts,
          * etc, in here. Note that currently we can't tell whether or not
-         * a handler handles the interrupt, though. 
+         * a handler handles the interrupt, though.
          */
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int hp300_request_irq(unsigned int irq,
                       unsigned long flags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
 {
         irq_node_t *t, *n = new_irq_node();
-        
+
         if (!n)                                   /* oops, no free nodes */
                 return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void hp300_free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
         unsigned long flags;
 
         spin_lock_irqsave(&irqlist_lock, flags);
-        
+
         t = hp300_irq_list[irq];
         if (!t)                                   /* no handlers at all for that IRQ */
         {
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void hp300_free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irqlist_lock, flags);
 		return;
         }
-        
+
         if (t->dev_id == dev_id)
         {                                         /* removing first handler on chain */
                 t->flags = IRQ_FLG_STD;           /* we probably don't really need these */
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ void hp300_free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irqlist_lock, flags);
 		return;
         }
-        
+
         /* OK, must be removing from middle of the chain */
-        
+
         for (t = hp300_irq_list[irq]; t->next && t->next->dev_id != dev_id; t = t->next)
                 /* do nothing */;
         if (!t->next)
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void hp300_free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 	t->next->devname = NULL;
 	t->next->handler = NULL;
         t->next = t->next->next;
-        
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irqlist_lock, flags);
 }