X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=sfa%2Fclient%2Fclient_helper.py;h=6e9170603a2524cff50fbcae9e3ca9d5079c5b4c;hb=796d35d54ab31e209ddf76b4584b6508b309c6c1;hp=15f4a2dbfac8c9b83f917c1bd4bb481fc34ec3b8;hpb=f58accad0a467774fa451ef690147d0b93671f44;p=sfa.git

diff --git a/sfa/client/client_helper.py b/sfa/client/client_helper.py
index 15f4a2db..6e917060 100644
--- a/sfa/client/client_helper.py
+++ b/sfa/client/client_helper.py
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 # it seems terribly wrong that the client should decide to use PG- or PL- related code
 # esp. in a context where we're trying to have more and more kinds of testbeds involved
 #
-# also, the 'users' filed that CreateSliver is expecting (the key point here is to get this right)
+# also, the 'users' field that CreateSliver is expecting (the key point here is to get this right)
 # is specified to have at least a urn and a list of keys, both of these being supported natively
 # in the sfa db
 # So long story short, it seems to me that we should have a common code that fills in 'urn' and 'keys'
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ def sfa_users_arg (records, slice_record):
         extra_fields = list ( set(pl_fields).union(set(nitos_fields)))
         # try to fill all these in
         for field in extra_fields:
-            if record.has_key(field): user[field]=record[field]
+            if field in record: user[field]=record[field]
         users.append(user)
 
     return users