X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=sfa%2Fclient%2Fclient_helper.py;h=d9239ad92b45e8635aa6a21192306e83392a7bfb;hb=1622da11642665d92f31787d692289d4932f2586;hp=2117b146508d9041453abd22645270230b8b9bc2;hpb=30b26f8f644e2c99673d15c96f2722b746f6fbe2;p=sfa.git

diff --git a/sfa/client/client_helper.py b/sfa/client/client_helper.py
index 2117b146..d9239ad9 100644
--- a/sfa/client/client_helper.py
+++ b/sfa/client/client_helper.py
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 # it seems terribly wrong that the client should decide to use PG- or PL- related code
 # esp. in a context where we're trying to have more and more kinds of testbeds involved
 #
-# also, the 'users' filed that CreateSliver is expecting (the key point here is to get this right)
+# also, the 'users' field that CreateSliver is expecting (the key point here is to get this right)
 # is specified to have at least a urn and a list of keys, both of these being supported natively
 # in the sfa db
 # So long story short, it seems to me that we should have a common code that fills in 'urn' and 'keys'
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ def pg_users_arg(records):
             continue
         user = {'urn': record['reg-urn'],
                 'keys': record['reg-keys'],
-                }
+                'email': record['email']}
         users.append(user)
     return users