From: Ben Pfaff Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:36:39 +0000 (-0700) Subject: vswitch: Clarify "arguments" versus "options". X-Git-Tag: v1.1.0pre1~109 X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eca2df312b03f39a28d361682b692a3dc547a79a;p=sliver-openvswitch.git vswitch: Clarify "arguments" versus "options". Interface has an "options" column but some text referred to "arguments" instead, which confused some readers. Also be even more explicit about syntax, since this also confused some readers. CC: Dan Wendlandt --- diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml index d29e14569..465f27dd1 100644 --- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml +++ b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml @@ -449,8 +449,8 @@ the same except one has an optional identifier and the other does not, the more specific one is matched first. in_key is considered more specific than local_ip if a port - defines one and another port defines the other. The arguments - are: + defines one and another port defines the other. The following + options may be specified in the column:
remote_ip
Required. The tunnel endpoint.
@@ -525,11 +525,23 @@
patch
-
A pair of virtual devices that act as a patch cable. A - peer argument is required that indicates the name - of the other side of the patch. Since a patch must work in - pairs, a second patch interface must be declared with the - name and peer arguments reversed.
+
+

+ A pair of virtual devices that act as a patch cable. The column must have the following key-value pair: +

+
+
peer
+
+ The of the for + the other side of the patch. The named 's own peer option must specify + this 's name. That is, the two patch + interfaces must have reversed and + peer values. +
+
+