From 8093d640ac758c062515b2819e633dd4e19c516a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Justin Pettit Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:16:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] secchan: Remove mention of "-f" flag as being equivalent "--fail" In an error message, it mentions a required argument to "-f or --fail", but "-f" is not a short form of "--fail". --- secchan/main.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/secchan/main.c b/secchan/main.c index c3d50a652..ee29f27be 100644 --- a/secchan/main.c +++ b/secchan/main.c @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ parse_options(int argc, char *argv[], struct ofsettings *s) } else if (!strcmp(optarg, "closed")) { s->fail_mode = FAIL_CLOSED; } else { - ovs_fatal(0, "-f or --fail argument must be \"open\" " - "or \"closed\""); + ovs_fatal(0, "--fail argument must be \"open\" or \"closed\""); } break; -- 2.43.0