From ce5e088be110aa5e219ead6b55ae521bf21d19a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Mack <tmack@paris.CS.Princeton.EDU>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:52:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fix bug in verify_slice
---
sfa/plc/plslices.py | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sfa/plc/plslices.py b/sfa/plc/plslices.py
index 898210eb..9d99887b 100644
--- a/sfa/plc/plslices.py
+++ b/sfa/plc/plslices.py
@@ -342,9 +342,10 @@ class PlSlices:
# unbind from peer so we can modify if necessary. Will bind back later
self.driver.shell.UnBindObjectFromPeer('slice', slice['slice_id'], peer['shortname'])
#Update existing record (e.g. expires field) it with the latest info.
- requested_expires = int(datetime_to_epoch(utcparse(slice_record['expires'])))
- if requested_expires and slice['expires'] != requested_expires:
- self.driver.shell.UpdateSlice( slice['slice_id'], {'expires' : requested_expires})
+ if slice_record.get('expires'):
+ requested_expires = int(datetime_to_epoch(utcparse(slice_record['expires'])))
+ if requested_expires and slice['expires'] != requested_expires:
+ self.driver.shell.UpdateSlice( slice['slice_id'], {'expires' : requested_expires})
return slice
--
2.47.0