/* * Copyright (c) 2008, 2011, 2012, 2013 Nicira, Inc. * * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. * You may obtain a copy of the License at: * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ #ifndef TAG_H #define TAG_H 1 #include #include #include #include "util.h" /* * Tagging support. * * A 'tag' represents an arbitrary category. Currently, tags are used to * represent categories of flows and in particular the value of the 64-bit * "metadata" field in the flow. The universe of possible categories is very * large (2**64). The number of categories in use at a given time can also be * large. This means that keeping track of category membership via * conventional means (lists, bitmaps, etc.) is likely to be expensive. * * Tags are actually implemented via a "superimposed coding", as discussed in * Knuth TAOCP v.3 section 6.5 "Retrieval on Secondary Keys". A tag is an * unsigned integer in which exactly 2 bits are set to 1 and the rest set to 0. * For 32-bit integers (as currently used) there are 32 * 31 / 2 = 496 unique * tags; for 64-bit integers there are 64 * 63 / 2 = 2,016. * * Because there is a small finite number of unique tags, tags must collide * after some number of them have been created. In practice we generally * create tags by choosing bits randomly or based on a hash function. * * The key property of tags is that we can combine them without increasing the * amount of data required using bitwise-OR, since the result has the 1-bits * from both tags set. The necessary tradeoff is that the result is even more * ambiguous: if combining two tags yields a value with 4 bits set to 1, then * the result value will test as having 4 * 3 / 2 = 6 unique tags, not just the * two tags that we combined. * * The upshot is this: a value that is the bitwise-OR combination of a number * of tags will always include the tags that were combined, but it may contain * any number of additional tags as well. This is acceptable for our use, * since we want to be sure that we check every classifier table that contains * a rule with a given metadata value, but it is OK if we check a few extra * tables as well. * * If we combine too many tags, then the result will have every bit set, so * that it will test as including every tag. This can happen, but we hope that * this is not the common case. */ /* Represents a tag, or the combination of 0 or more tags. */ typedef uint32_t tag_type; #define N_TAG_BITS (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(tag_type)) BUILD_ASSERT_DECL(IS_POW2(N_TAG_BITS)); /* A 'tag_type' value that intersects every tag. */ #define TAG_ALL UINT32_MAX /* An arbitrary tag. */ #define TAG_ARBITRARY UINT32_C(3) tag_type tag_create_deterministic(uint32_t seed); static inline bool tag_intersects(tag_type, tag_type); /* Returns true if 'a' and 'b' have at least one tag in common, * false if their set of tags is disjoint. */ static inline bool tag_intersects(tag_type a, tag_type b) { tag_type x = a & b; return (x & (x - 1)) != 0; } /* Adding tags is easy, but subtracting is hard because you can't tell whether * a bit was set only by the tag you're removing or by multiple tags. The * tag_tracker data structure counts the number of tags that set each bit, * which allows for efficient subtraction. */ struct tag_tracker { unsigned int counts[N_TAG_BITS]; }; void tag_tracker_init(struct tag_tracker *); void tag_tracker_add(struct tag_tracker *, tag_type *, tag_type); void tag_tracker_subtract(struct tag_tracker *, tag_type *, tag_type); #endif /* tag.h */