From bceafb631807c36e388d12b5e18d05cd7cb1a3af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:09:46 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] FAQ: Add QoS section. Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- FAQ | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index ab1c1ccab..72a147978 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -455,6 +455,110 @@ A: In version 1.9.0, OVS switched to using a single datapath that is commands provide similar functionality that is scoped by the bridge. +Quality of Service (QoS) +------------------------ + +Q: How do I configure Quality of Service (QoS)? + +A: Suppose that you want to set up bridge br0 connected to physical + Ethernet port eth0 (a 1 Gbps device) and virtual machine interfaces + vif1.0 and vif2.0, and that you want to limit traffic from vif1.0 + to eth0 to 10 Mbps and from vif2.0 to eth0 to 20 Mbps. Then, you + could configure the bridge this way: + + ovs-vsctl -- \ + add-br br0 -- \ + add-port br0 eth0 -- \ + add-port br0 vif1.0 -- set interface vif1.0 ofport_request=5 -- \ + add-port br0 vif2.0 -- set interface vif2.0 ofport_request=6 -- \ + set port eth0 qos=@newqos -- \ + --id=@newqos create qos type=linux-htb \ + other-config:max-rate=1000000000 \ + queues:123=@vif10queue \ + queues:234=@vif20queue -- \ + --id=@vif10queue create queue other-config:max-rate=10000000 -- \ + --id=@vif20queue create queue other-config:max-rate=20000000 + + At this point, bridge br0 is configured with the ports and eth0 is + configured with the queues that you need for QoS, but nothing is + actually directing packets from vif1.0 or vif2.0 to the queues that + we have set up for them. That means that all of the packets to + eth0 are going to the "default queue", which is not what we want. + + We use OpenFlow to direct packets from vif1.0 and vif2.0 to the + queues reserved for them: + + ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=5,actions=set_queue:123,normal + ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=6,actions=set_queue:234,normal + + Each of the above flows matches on the input port, sets up the + appropriate queue (123 for vif1.0, 234 for vif2.0), and then + executes the "normal" action, which performs the same switching + that Open vSwitch would have done without any OpenFlow flows being + present. (We know that vif1.0 and vif2.0 have OpenFlow port + numbers 5 and 6, respectively, because we set their ofport_request + columns above. If we had not done that, then we would have needed + to find out their port numbers before setting up these flows.) + + Now traffic going from vif1.0 or vif2.0 to eth0 should be + rate-limited. + + By the way, if you delete the bridge created by the above commands, + with: + + ovs-vsctl del-br br0 + + then that will leave one unreferenced QoS record and two + unreferenced Queue records in the Open vSwich database. One way to + clear them out, assuming you don't have other QoS or Queue records + that you want to keep, is: + + ovs-vsctl -- --all destroy QoS -- --all destroy Queue + +Q: I configured Quality of Service (QoS) in my OpenFlow network by + adding records to the QoS and Queue table, but the results aren't + what I expect. + +A: Did you install OpenFlow flows that use your queues? This is the + primary way to tell Open vSwitch which queues you want to use. If + you don't do this, then the default queue will be used, which will + probably not have the effect you want. + + Refer to the previous question for an example. + +Q: I configured QoS, correctly, but my measurements show that it isn't + working as well as I expect. + +A: With the Linux kernel, the Open vSwitch implementation of QoS has + two aspects: + + - Open vSwitch configures a subset of Linux kernel QoS + features, according to what is in OVSDB. It is possible that + this code has bugs. If you believe that this is so, then you + can configure the Linux traffic control (QoS) stack directly + with the "tc" program. If you get better results that way, + you can send a detailed bug report to bugs@openvswitch.org. + + It is certain that Open vSwitch cannot configure every Linux + kernel QoS feature. If you need some feature that OVS cannot + configure, then you can also use "tc" directly (or add that + feature to OVS). + + - The Open vSwitch implementation of OpenFlow allows flows to + be directed to particular queues. This is pretty simple and + unlikely to have serious bugs at this point. + + However, most problems with QoS on Linux are not bugs in Open + vSwitch at all. They tend to be either configuration errors + (please see the earlier questions in this section) or issues with + the traffic control (QoS) stack in Linux. The Open vSwitch + developers are not experts on Linux traffic control. We suggest + that, if you believe you are encountering a problem with Linux + traffic control, that you consult the tc manpages (e.g. tc(8), + tc-htb(8), tc-hfsc(8)), web resources (e.g. http://lartc.org/), or + mailing lists (e.g. http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#netdev). + + VLANs ----- -- 2.43.0