From: Loic Baron Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:21:59 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Terms and conditions: include the theme specific template into the generic view X-Git-Tag: myslice-1.5~2 X-Git-Url: http://git.onelab.eu/?p=unfold.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6c17f3004de22975899334e899a1882de8340023 Terms and conditions: include the theme specific template into the generic view --- diff --git a/portal/templates/termsview.html b/portal/templates/termsview.html index d89e8fbe..389386a9 100644 --- a/portal/templates/termsview.html +++ b/portal/templates/termsview.html @@ -10,386 +10,11 @@ - TERMS AND CONDITIONS -
- for OneLab Basic level service -
- Version 0.6 of 20 May 2014 -

-

Context

-

- 1.1 OneLab -

-

- OneLab is an experimental facility for testing new ideas and new technologies in the area of computer networking. It consists of a variety of types of - platforms, including: -

- -

- This list of types of platforms is subject to change, and the current list, along with the identities of the specific platforms of each type, can be found - on the OneLab website (onelab.eu). -

-

- Each platform has its own owners, and OneLab is the grouping of these platforms through a consortium of institutions. The OneLab consortium is coordinated - by UPMC Sorbonne Universités. It operates on a not-for-profit basis. -

-

- Access to OneLab may also provide access to additional platforms that are not part of OneLab, due to a federation agreement between OneLab and the owners - of those platforms. -

-

- 1.2 Fee-free Basic level service -

-

- These terms and conditions define and apply to OneLab's Basic level service, which is available free of charge. -

-

- Users who would like additional services are encouraged to contact support@onelab.eu. Some additional services require a written agreement, but are - otherwise free. Others require the payment of fees or in-kind contributions. (An example of an in-kind contribution is the hosting of a PlanetLab Europe - server node.) -

-

- 1.3 Managers and standard users -

-

- There are two classes of OneLab user: the manager and the standard user. OneLab grants access rights to managers, who, in turn, provide access rights to - standard users. Examples are: for a small enterprise, an executive may be the manager and the employees may be standard users; for a research team, a - senior scientist (faculty member or research scientist) may be a manager and doctoral students and other members of the team may be standard users; for a - university course, a professor may be a manager and the students may be standard users. -

-

- 1.4 These terms and conditions -

-

- Acceptance of these terms and conditions is a condition of obtaining OneLab Basic level user service. They are posted to the OneLab portal site - (portal.onelab.eu). They may be changed without other notice than the posting of a new version to the portal site. -

-

- 2 Services provided by OneLab -

-

- 2.1 Access to the experimental facility -

-

- OneLab provides users with access to the platforms that make up the experimental facility. Each platform owner determines the specifics of this access (for - example, how many nodes are available to a user, what happens in case of oversubscription, etc.), with the proviso that Basic level service requires that - users be able to conduct meaningful experiments on every OneLab testbed. -

-

- Basic level service may also provide access to platforms that are federated with OneLab, but such access depends upon the terms of the federation - agreements with those platforms, which may require that the user have a higher level of service in order to gain access. For example, Basic level service - provides access to PlanetLab Europe, a OneLab platform, without providing access to PlanetLab Central, a federated platform. Users wanting full access - across the global PlanetLab system should contact support@onelab.eu to arrange to enter into a PlanetLab Europe membership agreement. -

-

- OneLab's role is to facilitate access to the platforms. Specifically, it provides each user with: -

- -

- Additional support, such as accompaniment through the design and deployment of experiments and the interpretation of their results, is available through - higher levels of service. -

-

- 2.2 Best effort, without guarantees -

-

- OneLab and the owners of the individual OneLab testbeds do their best to provide the services outlined here, with the understanding that Basic level - service offers no guarantees. Users should clearly understand the following limitations. -

- -

- Users who seek such guarantees are invited to consider a higher level of service. -

-

- 2.3 Limitedliability -

-

- In no event shall the partners of the OneLab consortium be liable to any user for any consequential, incidental, punitive, or lost profit damages, or for - any damages arising out of loss of use or loss of data, to the extent that such damages arise out of the activities of OneLab consortium partners, or any - breach of the present terms and conditions, even if the consortium partner has been advised of the possibility of such damages. -

-

- Nothing contained in these terms and conditions shall be deemed as creating any rights or liabilities in or for third parties who are not Basic level users - of OneLab. -

-

- 3 Acceptable use policy -

-

- 3.1 Responsibilities of managers and standard users -

-

- OneLab creates and administers accounts for managers and delegates to managers the responsibility for creating and administering accounts for standard - users. Both managers and standard users are required to follow OneLab's acceptable use policy. In addition, managers are fully responsible for the - activities of the standard users whose accounts they create. -

-

- A manager is expected to grant user access only an individual with whom he or she has a working relationship. In general, this means an individual who - works for the same institution as the manager, or, in the case of higher education and research, an individual who is a student at the university where the - manager works. Managers may also grant access to individuals from other institutions, provided that they are collaborating on a common project on OneLab. - If there is a doubt, a manager should refer the question to support@onelab.eu. -

-

- 3.2 Types of use -

-

- OneLab may be used by enterprise, by scientific researchers, and by educators. -

-

- OneLab may be used for pre-commercial research and development. In keeping with OneLab's not-for-profit status, it may not be used to deploy services that - are designed to generate a commercial profit. -

-

- Not-for-profit use of OneLab to deploy services that are designed to generate revenue requires prior approval through a written agreement, and thus may not - be carried out on a Basic level account. Interested users are invited to contact support@onelab.eu. -

-

- OneLab may be used for scientific research. -

-

- OneLab may be used to host lab exercises for university courses. -

-

- Questions about other types of use should be addressed to support@onelab.eu. -

-

- 3.3 Applicable laws and regulations -

-

- OneLab is managed, and the portal is hosted, in France. Information regarding the countries in which individual testbeds are managed and hosted is - available from those testbeds. Users are responsible for being aware of the countries in which their experiments are deployed and for ensuring that their - use of OneLab fully conforms to the laws and regulations of those countries, as well as the laws and regulations of the country in which they themselves - are present when conducting their experiments. -

-

- Above and beyond specific national laws, the activities email spamming, phishing through web services, and all types of Internet fraud are prohibited on - OneLab. -

-

- 3.4 Security and accounting mechanisms -

-

- Users are expected to respect the security and accounting mechanisms put in place by OneLab, its platforms, and federated platforms. For example, access to - PlanetLab Europe is designed to take place through the SSH cryptographically-secured connection protocol, which uses public/private key pair - authentication, and so users should not attempt to bypass this mechanism. As another example, OneLab's notion of a "slice" associates a set of resources - with the group of users who have reserved those resources, and users should not attempt to obscure the identities of participants in a slice. -

-

- Hacking attempts against the OneLab portal and testbeds are not permitted. This includes "red team" (hacker test) experiments. -

-

- 3.5 Sharing of resources -

-

- OneLab is intended for ambitious experiments. Large numbers of resources and extended leases on resources may legitimately be granted in order to carry - these out. At the same time, OneLab and its testbeds are shared environments, and when there is contention for resources, limits must be imposed. -

-

- Each OneLab platform sets its own policies for handling resource contention. As a general rule, users are encouraged to design their experiments to use - resources efficiently. In particular, spinning/busy-waiting techniques for extended periods of time are strongly discouraged. Some resource contention - policies (e.g., PlanetLab Europe's) terminate the jobs that are using the most resources in the case of contention. -

-

- 3.6 Internet-connected platforms -

-

- Some of OneLab's platforms allow experiments to take place on resources that have access to the public internet. These experiments can potentially generate - traffic to, and receive traffic from, any host or router in the internet.[LB1] -

-

- Furthermore, some internet-connected platforms (e.g., PlanetLab Europe) consist of servers that are hosted by a large number of member institutions. -

-

- The accessibility of internet-connected platforms and the distributed hosting model of some of these platforms imply certain responsibilities on the part - of users, as detailed below. -

-

- 3.6.1 General guidance -

-

- A good litmus test when considering whether an experiment is appropriate for such internet-connected platforms is to ask what the network administrator at - one's own organisation would say about the experiment running locally. If the experiment disrupts local activity (e.g., uses more than its share of the - site's internet bandwidth) or triggers complaints from remote network administrators (e.g., performs systematic port scans), then it is not appropriate for - such internet-connected platforms. -

-

- It is the responsibility of the user and the user's manager to ensure that an application that will run on an internet-connected platform is tested and - debugged in a controlled environment, to better understand its behaviour prior to deployment. -

-

- 3.6.2 Standards of network etiquette -

-

- Internet-connected platforms are designed to support experiments that generate unusual traffic, such as network measurements. However, it is expected that - all users adhere to widely accepted standards of network etiquette in an effort to minimise complaints from network administrators. Activities that have - been interpreted as worm and denial-of-service attacks in the past (and should be avoided) include sending SYN packets to port 80 on random machines, - probing random IP addresses, repeatedly pinging routers, overloading bottleneck links with measurement traffic, and probing a single target machine from - many nodes. -

-

- For internet-connected platforms that have a distributed hosting model, each host institution will have its own acceptable use policy. Users should not - knowingly violate such local policies. Conflicts between local policies and OneLab's stated goal of supporting research into wide-area networks should be - brought to the attention of OneLab administrators at support@onelab.eu. -

-

- 3.6.3 Specific network usage rules -

-

- It is not allowed to use one or more nodes of an internet-connected platform to generate a high number of network flows or flood a site with high traffic - to the point of interfering with its normal operation. Use of congestion-controlled flows for large transfers is highly encouraged. -

-

- It is not allowed to perform systematic or random port or address block scans from an internet-connected platform. -

-

- For internet-connected platforms that use a distributed hosting model, it is not allowed to spoof or sniff traffic on a hosted server or on the network the - server belongs to. -

-

- Access to a server on a distributed hosting platform may not be used to gain access to other servers or networked equipment that are not part of the - testbed. -

-

- 3.7 Wireless platforms -

-

- Wireless-connected platforms give users access to nodes that communicate via Wi-Fi and other wireless technologies. They may be capable of detecting - wireless activity in the neighbourhood of those nodes: traffic generated by other users of the platform or by individuals not associated with the platform. - In general, much of the traffic will be encrypted, with certain aspects (such as SSIDs) not encrypted, but it is also possible that there will be fully - unencrypted traffic. They may also be capable of generating wireless activity that reaches equipment outside of the testbed. -

-

- Furthermore, some wireless-connected platforms may have built-in limitations to prevent them from generating signals at a strength that exceeds health and - safety regulations. -

-

- These characteristics of wireless-connected platforms imply certain responsibilities on the part of users, as detailed below. -

-

- 3.7.1 Specific network usage rules -

-

- Experimenters may make no attempt to defeat the encryption of encrypted third-party traffic. Furthermore, experimenters must treat with utmost discretion - any unencrypted traffic. Limited metadata can be recorded for the bona fide purposes of an experiment, but under no case should third party communications - be recorded. -

-

- No attempt may be made to reverse engineer traffic in order to learn the identities of the parties who have generated the traffic. -

-

- Wireless-connected platforms may not be used to gain access to any network equipment that is not part of the testbed itself. -

-

- It is not allowed to perform systematic or random scans of wireless networks that are not part of a wireless-connected platform. Similarly, it is not - allowed to spoof or sniff wireless traffic of the institution that hosts a wireless-connected platform or of other networks in the proximity. -

-

- Care must be taken so that traffic on wireless-connected platforms does not interfere with the normal functioning of network equipment that is not part of - the testbed itself. -

-

- No attempt may be made to defeat the mechanisms that limit signal strength on wireless-connected platforms. -

-

- 3.8 Handling suspected violations -

-

- Suspected violations of the OneLab acceptable use policy should be reported to support@onelab.eu. -

-

- Upon notification or detection of a possible violation, OneLab management will attempt to understand if a violation has in fact occurred. To do so, - management will freely communicate with the users concerned, the operators of the platforms concerned, as well as any third parties that might be involved. - An example of a third party is a network operator who detects what they believe to be unauthorized traffic emanating from a OneLab platform. -

-

- The priority is to resolve any real or apparent violations amicably. However, if OneLab management believes that a violation may have occurred, it can, at - its sole discretion, and without prior notice, apply any of the following measures: -

- -

- In the case of suspected illegal activity, OneLab management might need, without prior notice, to notify the relevant authorities. -

-
-
-
-
-
- - -
-
-
+
+ {% include theme|add:"_terms_and_conditions.html" %} +
{% endblock %}