+#################### status as of nov 29 2012
#
-### status as of may 23 2012
-# this essentially targets f16 of course
-# however in f16 gnuradio comes as 3.4 while f14 had 3.2:
+########## gnuradio
+# in f16 gnuradio comes as 3.4 while f14 had 3.2:
# [2012.05.23--wtx-f14-64] ~ # rpm -q gnuradio
# gnuradio-3.2.2-9.fc14.x86_64
# [2012.05.23--wexlxc-f16-64] ~ # rpm -q gnuradio
# we'll start with using plain lxc for orange and we'll see if that's a real issue
# might as well be just fine
#
-###
+########## spectools
+# moving forward I face another issue with spectools
+#
+# gcc -I./ -g -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -c spectool_raw.c -o spectool_raw.o
+# gcc spectool_container.o wispy_hw_gen1.o wispy_hw_24x.o wispy_hw_dbx.o spectool_net_client.o spectool_raw.o -o spectool_raw -lpthread -lm -lusb
+# wispy_hw_dbx.o: In function `wispydbx_usb_open':
+# /longbuildroot/BUILD/spectools-2009_06_R1/wispy_hw_dbx.c:635: undefined reference to `usb_debug'
+# collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
+# make[1]: *** [spectool_raw] Error 1
+# make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/BUILD/spectools-2009_06_R1'
+# error: Bad exit status from /longbuildroot/tmp/rpm-tmp.zqqEgL (%build)
+#
+# putting this aside as well for now
+#
+########## nodeimage
+# with this distro we reach the bootstrapfs tarballs with these sizes for last attempt
+# 2263306240 /var/www/html/boot/bootstrapfs-wexlxc-f16-x86_64.tar
+# 639539315 /var/www/html/boot/bootstrapfs-wexlxc-f16-x86_64.tar.bz2
+#
+# related or not, rpm fails like this
+# Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /longbuildroot/BUILDROOT/nodeimage-wexlxc-f16-x86_64-2.1-2.2012.11.29.x86_64
+# Wrote: /longbuildroot/RPMS/noarch/nodeimage-wexlxc-f16-x86_64-2.1-2.2012.11.29.noarch.rpm
+# error: create archive failed on file /longbuildroot/BUILDROOT/nodeimage-wexlxc-f16-x86_64-2.1-2.2012.11.29.x86_64/var/www/html/boot/bootstrapfs-wexlxc-f16-x86_64.tar: cpio: Bad magic
+# which suggests that the -plain packaging is failing;
+# the fact that cpio has a known limitation to 2Gb could be the culprit here,
+# although it seemed from other that the rpm we use didn't have that limitation...
+# # rpm -q rpm
+# rpm-4.9.1.3-1.fc16.x86_64
+#
+# dropping this for now; one way out would be to stop building the plain package, not sure how bad it would be for tests
+########################################
#
# declare the packages to be built and their dependencies
# initial version from Mark Huang
# now from the stock repo
bbn-DEVEL-RPMS := gnuradio gnuradio-devel boost boost-devel swig
#bbn-DEPEND-DEVEL-RPMS := gnuradio gnuradio-devel boost boost-devel
-ALL += bbn
-IN_NODEIMAGE += bbn
+#ALL += bbn
+#IN_NODEIMAGE += bbn
#
# crunchxml
crunchxml-MODULES := crunchxml
crunchxml-SPEC := crunchxml.spec
crunchxml-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
-crunchxml-DEVEL-RPMS := glib2-devel libxml-devel libxml2-devel scons
+crunchxml-DEVEL-RPMS := glib2-devel libxml-devel libxml2-devel scons gsl-devel
ALL += crunchxml
IN_NODEIMAGE += crunchxml
spectools-MODULES := spectools
spectools-SPEC := spectools.spec
spectools-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
-spectools-DEVEL-RPMS := gtk2-devel
-ALL += spectools
-IN_NODEIMAGE += spectools
+spectools-DEVEL-RPMS := gtk2-devel libusb-devel
+#ALL += spectools
+#IN_NODEIMAGE += spectools
#
# sge
# ALL += sge
# IN_NODEIMAGE += sge
+########################################
+#
+# lxctools: scripts for entering containers
#
-# kernel
+lxctools-MODULES := lxctools
+lxctools-SPEC := lxctools.spec
+ALL += lxctools
+IN_NODEIMAGE += lxctools
+
#
-# use a package name with srpm in it:
-# so the source rpm is created by running make srpm in the codebase
+# lxcsu: root context module for entering namespaces
#
+lxcsu-MODULES := lxcsu
+lxcsu-SPEC := lxcsu.spec
+ALL += lxcsu
+IN_NODEIMAGE += lxcsu
-# rebuild kernel-3.1 on fedora14 due to instabilities of the stock kernel
-ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "f14"
-kernel-MODULES := linux-3
-kernel-SPEC := kernel-3.1.spec
-kernel-DEVEL-RPMS += gettext elfutils-devel
-kernel-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
-ifeq "$(HOSTARCH)" "i386"
-kernel-RPMFLAGS:= --target i686 --with firmware
-else
-kernel-RPMFLAGS:= --target $(HOSTARCH) --with firmware
-endif
-kernel-SPECVARS += kernelconfig=planetlab
-KERNELS += kernel
+#
+#
+# transforward: root context module for transparent port forwarding
+#
+transforward-MODULES := transforward
+transforward-SPEC := transforward.spec
+ALL += transforward
+IN_NODEIMAGE += transforward
-kernels: $(KERNELS)
-kernels-clean: $(foreach package,$(KERNELS),$(package)-clean)
+#
+# procprotect: root context module for protecting against weaknesses in /proc
+#
+procprotect-MODULES := procprotect
+procprotect-SPEC := procprotect.spec
+ALL += procprotect
+IN_NODEIMAGE += procprotect
-ALL += $(KERNELS)
-# this is to mark on which image a given rpm is supposed to go
-IN_BOOTCD += $(KERNELS)
-IN_SLICEIMAGE += $(KERNELS)
-IN_NODEIMAGE += $(KERNELS)
-endif
+#
+# ipfw: root context module, and slice companion
+#
+ipfwroot-MODULES := ipfw
+ipfwroot-SPEC := planetlab/ipfwroot.spec
+ALL += ipfwroot
+IN_NODEIMAGE += ipfwroot
+
+ipfwslice-MODULES := ipfw
+ipfwslice-SPEC := planetlab/ipfwslice.spec
+ALL += ipfwslice
#
# NodeUpdate
IN_NODEIMAGE += ipod
#
-# NodeManager
+# plnode-utils
+#
+plnode-utils-MODULES := plnode-utils
+plnode-utils-SPEC := plnode-utils-lxc.spec
+ALL += plnode-utils
+IN_NODEIMAGE += plnode-utils
+
+#
+# nodemanager
#
-nodemanager-MODULES := nodemanager
-nodemanager-SPEC := NodeManager.spec
-ALL += nodemanager
-IN_NODEIMAGE += nodemanager
+nodemanager-lib-MODULES := nodemanager
+nodemanager-lib-SPEC := nodemanager-lib.spec
+ALL += nodemanager-lib
+IN_NODEIMAGE += nodemanager-lib
+
+nodemanager-lxc-MODULES := nodemanager
+nodemanager-lxc-SPEC := nodemanager-lxc.spec
+ALL += nodemanager-lxc
+IN_NODEIMAGE += nodemanager-lxc
#
# pl_sshd
ALL += fprobe-ulog
IN_NODEIMAGE += fprobe-ulog
+#################### libvirt on f16 is too old, sounds like f17 has something fine
+local_libvirt=false
+ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "f16"
+local_libvirt=true
+endif
+
+ifeq "$(local_libvirt)" "true"
#
# libvirt
#
libvirt-DEVEL-RPMS += libxml2-devel gnutls-devel device-mapper-devel yajl-devel gettext
libvirt-DEVEL-RPMS += python-devel libcap-ng-devel libpciaccess-devel radvd numactl-devel
libvirt-DEVEL-RPMS += xhtml1-dtds libxslt libtasn1-devel systemtap-sdt-devel iptables-ipv6 augeas
-libvirt-DEVEL-RPMS += libudev-devel
+libvirt-DEVEL-RPMS += libudev-devel libpcap-devel libnl-devel ebtables scrub
libvirt-RPMFLAGS := --without storage-disk --without storage-iscsi --without storage-scsi \
--without storage-fs --without storage-lvm \
--without polkit --without sasl --without audit --with capng --with udev \
ALL += libvirt
IN_NODEREPO += libvirt
IN_NODEIMAGE += libvirt
+endif
#
# DistributedRateLimiting
# vsys-scripts
#
vsys-scripts-MODULES := vsys-scripts
-vsys-scripts-SPEC := vsys-scripts.spec
+vsys-scripts-SPEC := root-context/vsys-scripts.spec
IN_NODEIMAGE += vsys-scripts
ALL += vsys-scripts
+#
+# bind_public
+#
+bind_public-MODULES := bind_public
+bind_public-SPEC := bind_public.spec
+IN_SLICEIMAGE += bind_public
+ALL += bind_public
+
#
# plcapi
#
ALL += www-register-wizard
IN_MYPLC += www-register-wizard
-#
-# pcucontrol
-#
-pcucontrol-MODULES := pcucontrol
-pcucontrol-SPEC := pcucontrol.spec
-ALL += pcucontrol
-
-#
-# monitor
-#
-#monitor-MODULES := monitor
-#monitor-SPEC := Monitor.spec
-#monitor-DEVEL-RPMS += net-snmp net-snmp-devel
-#ALL += monitor
-#IN_NODEIMAGE += monitor
-
-#
-# PLC RT
-#
-plcrt-MODULES := PLCRT
-plcrt-SPEC := plcrt.spec
-ALL += plcrt
-
-# f12 has 0.9-1 already
-ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "$(filter $(DISTRONAME),f8 centos5)"
-#
-# pyopenssl
-#
-pyopenssl-MODULES := pyopenssl
-pyopenssl-SPEC := pyOpenSSL.spec
-pyopenssl-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
-ALL += pyopenssl
-endif
-
#
# pyaspects
#
pyaspects-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
ALL += pyaspects
-# sfa now uses the with statement that's not supported on python-2.4 - not even through __future__
-# In addition we now use sqlalchemy and 0.5 as per f12 is not compatible with our model
-build_sfa=true
-ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "$(filter $(DISTRONAME),f8 f12 centos5)"
-build_sfa=false
-endif
-
-ifeq "$(build_sfa)" "true"
-#
-# sfa - Slice Facility Architecture
-#
-sfa-MODULES := sfa
-sfa-SPEC := sfa.spec
-ALL += sfa
-
-sface-MODULES := sface
-sface-SPEC := sface.spec
-ALL += sface
-endif
-
#
# nodeconfig
#