# now from the stock repo
bbn-DEVEL-RPMS := gnuradio gnuradio-devel boost boost-devel swig
#bbn-DEPEND-DEVEL-RPMS := gnuradio gnuradio-devel boost boost-devel
-ALL += bbn
-IN_NODEIMAGE += bbn
+#ALL += bbn
+#IN_NODEIMAGE += bbn
#
# crunchxml
ALL += www-register-wizard
IN_MYPLC += www-register-wizard
-#
-# pcucontrol
-#
-pcucontrol-MODULES := pcucontrol
-pcucontrol-SPEC := pcucontrol.spec
-ALL += pcucontrol
-
-#
-# monitor
-#
-#monitor-MODULES := monitor
-#monitor-SPEC := Monitor.spec
-#monitor-DEVEL-RPMS += net-snmp net-snmp-devel
-#ALL += monitor
-#IN_NODEIMAGE += monitor
-
-#
-# PLC RT
-#
-plcrt-MODULES := PLCRT
-plcrt-SPEC := plcrt.spec
-ALL += plcrt
-
-# f12 has 0.9-1 already
-ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "$(filter $(DISTRONAME),f8 centos5)"
-#
-# pyopenssl
-#
-pyopenssl-MODULES := pyopenssl
-pyopenssl-SPEC := pyOpenSSL.spec
-pyopenssl-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
-ALL += pyopenssl
-endif
-
#
# pyaspects
#
pyaspects-BUILD-FROM-SRPM := yes
ALL += pyaspects
-# sfa now uses the with statement that's not supported on python-2.4 - not even through __future__
-# In addition we now use sqlalchemy and 0.5 as per f12 is not compatible with our model
-build_sfa=true
-ifeq "$(DISTRONAME)" "$(filter $(DISTRONAME),f8 f12 centos5)"
-build_sfa=false
-endif
-
-ifeq "$(build_sfa)" "true"
-#
-# sfa - Slice Facility Architecture
-#
-sfa-MODULES := sfa
-sfa-SPEC := sfa.spec
-ALL += sfa
-
-sface-MODULES := sface
-sface-SPEC := sface.spec
-ALL += sface
-endif
-
#
# nodeconfig
#