vserver 1.9.3
[linux-2.6.git] / drivers / s390 / scsi / zfcp_fsf.c
index 79451af..44c646c 100644 (file)
  */
 
 /* this drivers version (do not edit !!! generated and updated by cvs) */
-#define ZFCP_FSF_C_REVISION "$Revision: 1.55 $"
+#define ZFCP_FSF_C_REVISION "$Revision: 1.65 $"
 
 #include "zfcp_ext.h"
 
 static int zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
+static void zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_close_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_close_physical_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_status_read_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_send_ct_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_send_els_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
 static int zfcp_fsf_control_file_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
-static inline int zfcp_fsf_req_create_sbal_check(
+static inline int zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_check(
        unsigned long *, struct zfcp_qdio_queue *, int);
 static inline int zfcp_use_one_sbal(
        struct scatterlist *, int, struct scatterlist *, int);
@@ -79,10 +80,9 @@ static u32 fsf_qtcb_type[] = {
 };
 
 static const char zfcp_act_subtable_type[5][8] = {
-       {"unknown"}, {"OS"}, {"WWPN"}, {"DID"}, {"LUN"}
+       "unknown", "OS", "WWPN", "DID", "LUN"
 };
 
-
 /****************************************************************/
 /*************** FSF related Functions  *************************/
 /****************************************************************/
@@ -684,13 +684,11 @@ zfcp_fsf_fsfstatus_qual_eval(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                break;
        case FSF_SQ_ULP_PROGRAMMING_ERROR:
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(0, "FSF_SQ_ULP_PROGRAMMING_ERROR\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("bug: An illegal amount of data was attempted "
-                               "to be sent to the adapter %s "
-                               "Stopping all operations on this adapter. ",
+               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("error: not enough SBALs for data transfer "
+                               "(adapter %s)\n",
                                zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(fsf_req->adapter));
                debug_text_exception(fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 0,
                                     "fsf_sq_ulp_err");
-               zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(fsf_req->adapter, 0);
                fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
                break;
        case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE:
@@ -785,6 +783,11 @@ zfcp_fsf_req_dispatch(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_handler(fsf_req);
                break;
 
+       case FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_PORT_DATA :
+               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_PORT_DATA\n");
+               zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_handler(fsf_req);
+               break;
+
        case FSF_QTCB_SEND_ELS :
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_QTCB_SEND_ELS\n");
                zfcp_fsf_send_els_handler(fsf_req);
@@ -1624,26 +1627,6 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_ct_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
                break;
 
-       case FSF_REQUEST_BUF_NOT_VALID :
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_REQUEST_BUF_NOT_VALID\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("error: The port 0x%016Lx on adapter %s has "
-                               "rejected a generic services command "
-                               "due to invalid request buffer.\n",
-                               port->wwpn, zfcp_get_busid_by_port(port));
-               debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 1, "fsf_s_reqiv");
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               break;
-
-       case FSF_RESPONSE_BUF_NOT_VALID :
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_RESPONSE_BUF_NOT_VALID\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("error: The port 0x%016Lx on adapter %s has "
-                               "rejected a generic services command "
-                               "due to invalid response buffer.\n",
-                               port->wwpn, zfcp_get_busid_by_port(port));
-               debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 1, "fsf_s_resiv");
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               break;
-
         case FSF_PORT_BOXED :
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_PORT_BOXED\n");
                ZFCP_LOG_INFO("The remote port 0x%016Lx on adapter %s "
@@ -1665,9 +1648,10 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_ct_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
        }
 
 skip_fsfstatus:
-       if (send_ct->handler != NULL) {
+       send_ct->status = retval;
+
+       if (send_ct->handler != NULL)
                send_ct->handler(send_ct->handler_data);
-        }
 
        return retval;
 }
@@ -1769,7 +1753,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_els(struct zfcp_send_els *els)
        sbale = zfcp_qdio_sbale_req(fsf_req, fsf_req->sbal_curr, 0);
 
        /* start QDIO request for this FSF request */
-       ret = zfcp_fsf_req_send(fsf_req, NULL);
+       ret = zfcp_fsf_req_send(fsf_req, els->timer);
        if (ret) {
                ZFCP_LOG_DEBUG("error: initiation of ELS request failed "
                               "(adapter %s, port 0x%016Lx)\n",
@@ -1863,6 +1847,10 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_send_els_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                        /* ERP strategy will escalate */
                        debug_text_event(adapter->erp_dbf, 1, "fsf_sq_ulp");
                        fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
+                       retval =
+                         zfcp_handle_els_rjt(header->fsf_status_qual.word[1],
+                                             (struct zfcp_ls_rjt_par *)
+                                             &header->fsf_status_qual.word[2]);
                        break;
                case FSF_SQ_RETRY_IF_POSSIBLE:
                        ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_SQ_RETRY_IF_POSSIBLE\n");
@@ -1921,15 +1909,6 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_send_els_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                        bottom->resp_buf_length);
                break;
 
-       case FSF_UNKNOWN_COMMAND:
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_UNKNOWN_COMMAND\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_INFO(
-                       "FSF command 0x%x is not supported by FCP adapter "
-                       "(adapter: %s)\n", fsf_req->fsf_command,
-                       zfcp_get_busid_by_port(port));
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               break;
-
        case FSF_ACCESS_DENIED:
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_ACCESS_DENIED\n");
                ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("Access denied, cannot send ELS "
@@ -1971,8 +1950,6 @@ skip_fsfstatus:
        if (send_els->handler != 0)
                send_els->handler(send_els->handler_data);
 
-       kfree(send_els);
-
        return retval;
 }
 
@@ -2219,6 +2196,111 @@ zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
        return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data - request information about local port
+ * @adapter: for which port data is requested
+ * @data: response to exchange port data request
+ */
+int
+zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
+                           struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *data)
+{
+       volatile struct qdio_buffer_element *sbale;
+       int retval = 0;
+       unsigned long lock_flags;
+        struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req;
+       struct timer_list *timer;
+
+        if(!(adapter->supported_features & FSF_FEATURE_HBAAPI_MANAGEMENT)){
+               ZFCP_LOG_INFO("error: exchange port data "
+                              "command not supported by adapter %s\n",
+                             zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
+                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+        }
+
+       timer = kmalloc(sizeof(struct timer_list), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!timer)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       /* setup new FSF request */
+       retval = zfcp_fsf_req_create(adapter, FSF_QTCB_EXCHANGE_PORT_DATA,
+                                     0, 0, &lock_flags, &fsf_req);
+       if (retval < 0) {
+               ZFCP_LOG_INFO("error: Out of resources. Could not create an "
+                              "exchange port data request for"
+                              "the adapter %s.\n",
+                             zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
+               write_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->request_queue.queue_lock,
+                                       lock_flags);
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       sbale = zfcp_qdio_sbale_req(fsf_req, fsf_req->sbal_curr, 0);
+        sbale[0].flags |= SBAL_FLAGS0_TYPE_READ;
+        sbale[1].flags |= SBAL_FLAGS_LAST_ENTRY;
+
+        fsf_req->data.port_data = data;
+
+       init_timer(timer);
+       timer->function = zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler;
+       timer->data = (unsigned long) adapter;
+       timer->expires = ZFCP_FSF_REQUEST_TIMEOUT;
+
+       retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(fsf_req, timer);
+       if (retval) {
+               ZFCP_LOG_INFO("error: Could not send an exchange port data "
+                              "command on the adapter %s\n",
+                             zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
+               zfcp_fsf_req_free(fsf_req);
+               write_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->request_queue.queue_lock,
+                                       lock_flags);
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       ZFCP_LOG_DEBUG("Exchange Port Data request initiated (adapter %s)\n",
+                      zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
+
+       write_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->request_queue.queue_lock,
+                               lock_flags);
+
+       wait_event(fsf_req->completion_wq,
+                  fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_COMPLETED);
+       del_timer_sync(timer);
+       zfcp_fsf_req_cleanup(fsf_req);
+ out:
+       kfree(timer);
+       return retval;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_handler - handler for exchange_port_data request
+ * @fsf_req: pointer to struct zfcp_fsf_req
+ */
+static void
+zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
+{
+       struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *bottom;
+       struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *data = fsf_req->data.port_data;
+
+       if (fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR)
+               return;
+
+       switch (fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status) {
+        case FSF_GOOD :
+                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2,"FSF_GOOD\n");
+                bottom = &fsf_req->qtcb->bottom.port;
+                memcpy(data, bottom, sizeof(*data));
+                break;
+
+        default:
+               debug_text_event(fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 0, "xchg-port-ng");
+                debug_event(fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 0,
+                           &fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status, sizeof(u32));
+       }
+}
+
+
 /*
  * function:    zfcp_fsf_open_port
  *
@@ -3319,19 +3401,19 @@ zfcp_fsf_close_unit_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
        return retval;
 }
 
-/*
- * function:    zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task
- *
- * purpose:
- *
- * returns:
- *
- * note: we do not employ linked commands (not supported by HBA anyway)
+/**
+ * zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task - initiate an FCP command (for a SCSI command)
+ * @adapter: adapter where scsi command is issued
+ * @unit: unit where command is sent to
+ * @scsi_cmnd: scsi command to be sent
+ * @timer: timer to be started when request is initiated
+ * @req_flags: flags for fsf_request
  */
 int
 zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
                               struct zfcp_unit *unit,
-                              struct scsi_cmnd * scsi_cmnd, int req_flags)
+                              struct scsi_cmnd * scsi_cmnd,
+                              struct timer_list *timer, int req_flags)
 {
        struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req = NULL;
        struct fcp_cmnd_iu *fcp_cmnd_iu;
@@ -3486,7 +3568,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
         * start QDIO request for this FSF request
         *  covered by an SBALE)
         */
-       retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(fsf_req, NULL);
+       retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(fsf_req, timer);
        if (unlikely(retval < 0)) {
                ZFCP_LOG_INFO("error: Could not send FCP command request "
                              "on adapter %s, port 0x%016Lx, unit 0x%016Lx\n",
@@ -3788,44 +3870,6 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
                break;
 
-               /* FIXME: this should be obsolete, isn' it? */
-       case FSF_INBOUND_DATA_LENGTH_NOT_VALID:
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(0, "FSF_INBOUND_DATA_LENGTH_NOT_VALID\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("bug: An invalid inbound data length field "
-                               "was found in a command for unit 0x%016Lx "
-                               "on port 0x%016Lx on adapter %s.\n",
-                               unit->fcp_lun,
-                               unit->port->wwpn, zfcp_get_busid_by_unit(unit));
-               /* stop operation for this adapter */
-               debug_text_event(fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 0,
-                                "fsf_s_in_dl_nv");
-               zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(unit->port->adapter, 0);
-               zfcp_cmd_dbf_event_fsf("idleninv",
-                                      fsf_req,
-                                      &header->fsf_status_qual,
-                                      sizeof (union fsf_status_qual));
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               break;
-
-               /* FIXME: this should be obsolete, isn' it? */
-       case FSF_OUTBOUND_DATA_LENGTH_NOT_VALID:
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(0, "FSF_OUTBOUND_DATA_LENGTH_NOT_VALID\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("bug: An invalid outbound data length field "
-                               "was found in a command unit 0x%016Lx on port "
-                               "0x%016Lx on adapter %s\n",
-                               unit->fcp_lun,
-                               unit->port->wwpn,
-                               zfcp_get_busid_by_unit(unit));
-               /* stop operation for this adapter */
-               debug_text_event(fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 0,
-                                "fsf_s_out_dl_nv");
-               zfcp_erp_adapter_shutdown(unit->port->adapter, 0);
-               zfcp_cmd_dbf_event_fsf("odleninv", fsf_req,
-                                      &header->fsf_status_qual,
-                                      sizeof (union fsf_status_qual));
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               break;
-
        case FSF_CMND_LENGTH_NOT_VALID:
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(0, "FSF_CMND_LENGTH_NOT_VALID\n");
                ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL
@@ -4157,87 +4201,6 @@ zfcp_fsf_send_fcp_command_task_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
        }
 
  skip_fsfstatus:
-#if 0
-       /*
-        * This nasty chop at the problem is not working anymore
-        * as we do not adjust the retry count anylonger in order
-        * to have a number of retries that avoids I/O errors.
-        * The manipulation of the retry count has been removed
-        * in favour of a safe tape device handling. We must not
-        * sent SCSI commands more than once to a device if no
-        * retries are permitted by the high level driver. Generally
-        * speaking, it was a mess to change retry counts. So it is
-        * fine that this sort of workaround is gone.
-        * Then, we had to face a certain number of immediate retries in case of
-        * busy and queue full conditions (see below).
-        * This is not acceptable
-        * for the latter. Queue full conditions are used
-        * by devices to indicate to a host that the host can rely
-        * on the completion (or timeout) of at least one outstanding
-        * command as a suggested trigger for command retries.
-        * Busy conditions require a different trigger since
-        * no commands are outstanding for that initiator from the
-        * devices perspective.
-        * The drawback of mapping a queue full condition to a
-        * busy condition is the chance of wasting all retries prior
-        * to the time when the device indicates that a command
-        * rejected due to a queue full condition should be re-driven.
-        * This case would lead to unnecessary I/O errors that
-        * have to be considered fatal if for example ext3's
-        * journaling would be torpedoed by such an avoidable
-        * I/O error.
-        * So, what issues are there with not mapping a queue-full
-        * condition to a busy condition?
-        * Due to the 'exclusive LUN'
-        * policy enforced by the zSeries FCP channel, this 
-        * Linux instance is the only initiator with regard to
-        * this adapter. It is safe to rely on the information
-        * 'don't disturb me now ... and btw. no other commands
-        * pending for you' (= queue full) sent by the LU,
-        * since no other Linux can use this LUN via this adapter
-        * at the same time. If there is a potential race
-        * introduced by the FCP channel by not inhibiting Linux A
-        * to give up a LU with commands pending while Linux B
-        * grabs this LU and sends commands  - thus providing
-        * an exploit at the 'exclusive LUN' policy - then this
-        * issue has to be considered a hardware problem. It should
-        * be tracked as such if it really occurs. Even if the
-        * FCP Channel spec. begs exploiters to wait for the
-        * completion of all request sent to a LU prior to
-        * closing this LU connection.
-        * This spec. statement in conjunction with
-        * the 'exclusive LUN' policy is not consistent design.
-        * Another issue is how resource constraints for SCSI commands
-        * might be handled by the FCP channel (just guessing for now).
-        * If the FCP channel would always map resource constraints,
-        * e.g. no free FC exchange ID due to I/O stress caused by
-        * other sharing Linux instances, to faked queue-full
-        * conditions then this would be a misinterpretation and
-        * violation of SCSI standards.
-        * If there are SCSI stack races as indicated below
-        * then they need to be fixed just there.
-        * Providing all issue above are not applicable or will
-        * be fixed appropriately, removing the following hack
-        * is the right thing to do.
-        */
-
-       /*
-        * Note: This is a rather nasty chop at the problem. We cannot 
-        * risk adding to the mlqueue however as this will block the 
-        * device. If it is the last outstanding command for this host
-        * it will remain blocked indefinitely. This would be quite possible
-        * on the zSeries FCP adapter.
-        * Also, there exists a race with scsi_insert_special relying on 
-        * scsi_request_fn to recalculate some command data which may not 
-        * happen when q->plugged is true in scsi_request_fn
-        */
-       if (status_byte(scpnt->result) == QUEUE_FULL) {
-               ZFCP_LOG_DEBUG("Changing QUEUE_FULL to BUSY....\n");
-               scpnt->result &= ~(QUEUE_FULL << 1);
-               scpnt->result |= (BUSY << 1);
-       }
-#endif
-
        ZFCP_LOG_DEBUG("scpnt->result =0x%x\n", scpnt->result);
 
        zfcp_cmd_dbf_event_scsi("response", scpnt);
@@ -4585,16 +4548,6 @@ zfcp_fsf_control_file_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
                retval = -EIO;
                break;
 
-       case FSF_UNKNOWN_COMMAND:
-               ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_UNKNOWN_COMMAND\n");
-               ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL(
-                       "FSF command 0x%x is not supported by the adapter %s\n",
-                       fsf_req->fsf_command,
-                       zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
-               fsf_req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR;
-               retval = -EINVAL;
-               break;
-
        case FSF_UNKNOWN_OP_SUBTYPE:
                ZFCP_LOG_FLAGS(2, "FSF_UNKNOWN_OP_SUBTYPE\n");
                ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL(
@@ -4682,8 +4635,8 @@ zfcp_fsf_req_wait_and_cleanup(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req,
 }
 
 static inline int
-zfcp_fsf_req_create_sbal_check(unsigned long *flags,
-                              struct zfcp_qdio_queue *queue, int needed)
+zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_check(unsigned long *flags,
+                       struct zfcp_qdio_queue *queue, int needed)
 {
        write_lock_irqsave(&queue->queue_lock, *flags);
        if (likely(atomic_read(&queue->free_count) >= needed))
@@ -4712,30 +4665,25 @@ zfcp_fsf_req_qtcb_init(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req, u32 fsf_cmd)
  * zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_get - try to get one SBAL in the request queue
  * @adapter: adapter for which request queue is examined
  * @req_flags: flags indicating whether to wait for needed SBAL or not
- * @lock_flags: lock_flags is queue_lock is taken
- *
- * locking: on success the queue_lock for the request queue of the adapter
- *     is held
+ * @lock_flags: lock_flags if queue_lock is taken
+ * Return: 0 on success, otherwise -EIO, or -ERESTARTSYS
+ * Locks: lock adapter->request_queue->queue_lock on success
  */
 static int
 zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_get(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, int req_flags,
                      unsigned long *lock_flags)
 {
-        int condition;
+        long ret;
         struct zfcp_qdio_queue *req_queue = &adapter->request_queue;
 
         if (unlikely(req_flags & ZFCP_WAIT_FOR_SBAL)) {
-                wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->request_wq,
-                                                (condition =
-                                                 zfcp_fsf_req_create_sbal_check
-                                                 (lock_flags, req_queue, 1)),
-                                                ZFCP_SBAL_TIMEOUT);
-                if (!condition) {
-                        return -EIO;
-               }
-        } else if (!zfcp_fsf_req_create_sbal_check(lock_flags, req_queue, 1)) {
+                ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->request_wq,
+                       zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_check(lock_flags, req_queue, 1),
+                                                      ZFCP_SBAL_TIMEOUT);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       return ret;
+        } else if (!zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_check(lock_flags, req_queue, 1))
                 return -EIO;
-       }
 
         return 0;
 }