+static int
+type_run_fast(const char *type)
+{
+ struct dpif_backer *backer;
+
+ backer = shash_find_data(&all_dpif_backers, type);
+ if (!backer) {
+ /* This is not necessarily a problem, since backers are only
+ * created on demand. */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return dpif_backer_run_fast(backer, FLOW_MISS_MAX_BATCH);
+}
+
+static void
+run_fast_rl(void)
+{
+ static long long int port_rl = LLONG_MIN;
+ static unsigned int backer_rl = 0;
+
+ if (time_msec() >= port_rl) {
+ struct ofproto_dpif *ofproto;
+ struct ofport_dpif *ofport;
+
+ HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofproto, all_ofproto_dpifs_node, &all_ofproto_dpifs) {
+
+ HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofport, up.hmap_node, &ofproto->up.ports) {
+ port_run_fast(ofport);
+ }
+ }
+ port_rl = time_msec() + 200;
+ }
+
+ /* XXX: We have to be careful not to do too much work in this function. If
+ * we call dpif_backer_run_fast() too often, or with too large a batch,
+ * performance improves signifcantly, but at a cost. It's possible for the
+ * number of flows in the datapath to increase without bound, and for poll
+ * loops to take 10s of seconds. The correct solution to this problem,
+ * long term, is to separate flow miss handling into it's own thread so it
+ * isn't affected by revalidations, and expirations. Until then, this is
+ * the best we can do. */
+ if (++backer_rl >= 10) {
+ struct shash_node *node;
+
+ backer_rl = 0;
+ SHASH_FOR_EACH (node, &all_dpif_backers) {
+ dpif_backer_run_fast(node->data, 1);
+ }
+ }
+}
+